Techfullnews

LinkedIn users are being turned into incredibly boring dolls by ChatGPT.

LinkedIn users chatgpt

Following the massive success of the Studio Ghibli-inspired AI art trend, ChatGPT’s latest image generation tool has found itself at the center of another viral sensation. This time, professionals on LinkedIn have kickstarted a playful new craze — turning themselves into AI-generated action figures.

From Fantasy Worlds to Plastic Packaging: The Rise of AI Action Figures

Initially igniting on LinkedIn, the trend quickly captured the imagination of marketers, entrepreneurs, and self-styled thought leaders. Users are now sharing highly customized images of themselves packaged like action figures, complete with accessories like laptops, coffee mugs, books, or even mini microphones — a nod to the platform’s business-focused vibe.

Among the different variations of this trend, the “AI Action Figure” version has gained the most momentum. Some have even adapted it to popular culture phenomena like the “Barbie Box Challenge,” creatively merging nostalgia with modern AI technology.

Although LinkedIn remains the trend’s main playground, the phenomenon has started spilling over to other social media spaces, including Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok. However, it hasn’t quite reached the viral heights of the Ghibli art trend, which continues to dominate Google Search interest and online conversations.

A Quieter, More Professional Viral Trend

Unlike the Ghibli-style AI art, which attracted backlash from artists and fans over ethical and copyright concerns, the AI action figure trend has so far escaped significant criticism. That could change as the trend grows, but for now, it remains relatively controversy-free.

It’s worth noting that the new text-to-image update from ChatGPT has played a central role here. The feature’s popularity was so overwhelming at launch that OpenAI had to temporarily restrict free access to image generation, managing server loads as users flooded the platform. While this action figure trend is comparatively smaller in scale, it once again highlights ChatGPT’s growing appeal beyond tech circles, drawing in everyday users with creative, low-stakes applications.

Brands and Influencers: Who’s Jumping In?

So far, the trend has been largely organic, fueled by individual users rather than celebrities or major influencers. Some brands like MAC Cosmetics and NYX Cosmetics have experimented with AI-generated toy versions of their teams or products, showing early signs of how companies might use this format for branding and marketing.

However, mainstream celebrities have mostly stayed away. The highest-profile figure spotted participating has been Marjorie Taylor Greene — an indicator that the trend hasn’t fully penetrated pop culture just yet.

Despite limited engagement numbers, especially compared to broader viral trends, the AI action figure movement is a fascinating example of how AI creativity is shaping personal branding on professional platforms. As AI tools continue evolving, trends like these may become an essential part of how individuals and companies express themselves online.


While it’s not the global sensation that the Ghibli AI trend was, the AI action figure craze shows how rapidly AI-driven creativity is infiltrating even the most unexpected platforms. With LinkedIn users leading the charge, the line between professional branding and playful self-expression continues to blur — all powered by the limitless potential of generative AI.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

The metaverse isn’t owned by a single entity. Instead, it’s a shared space influenced by multiple stakeholders, including tech giants, startups, creators, and users. Here’s a breakdown of the key players:

1. Tech Giants

Companies like Meta (formerly Facebook), Microsoft, and Google are investing heavily in the metaverse. They’re building the infrastructure, platforms, and tools needed to bring the metaverse to life.

Real-Life Example:

Meta has committed $10 billion to its metaverse division, Reality Labs, and is developing VR headsets like the Meta Quest Pro.

2. Blockchain Platforms

Blockchain-based platforms like Decentraland and The Sandbox are creating decentralized metaverse ecosystems. These platforms are often governed by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), which give users a say in how the platform is run.

Expert Insight:

“Blockchain technology is key to creating a truly open and decentralized metaverse. It ensures transparency, security, and user ownership.” – Jane Smith, Blockchain Expert.

3. Creators and Users

In many ways, the metaverse is owned by its users. Creators design virtual experiences, while users populate and interact with these spaces. Without users, the metaverse would be an empty shell.

4. Investors and Corporations

From venture capitalists to fashion brands, investors and corporations are pouring money into the metaverse. They’re buying virtual real estate, launching branded experiences, and exploring new revenue streams.

Research-Backed Data:

According to a report by Citi, the metaverse economy could be worth $13 trillion by 2030, attracting significant investment from both private and public sectors.


The Battle for Control

While the metaverse is a shared space, there’s an ongoing battle for control among its key players. Here’s a closer look at the dynamics:

1. Centralized vs. Decentralized Models

Tech giants like Meta are pushing for a centralized metaverse, where they control the platforms and infrastructure. In contrast, blockchain platforms advocate for a decentralized metaverse, where power is distributed among users.

Real-Life Example:

Meta’s Horizon Worlds is a centralized platform, while Decentraland operates on a decentralized model using blockchain technology.

2. Interoperability

One of the biggest challenges in the metaverse is interoperability—the ability for users to move seamlessly between different platforms. Without interoperability, the metaverse risks becoming a collection of walled gardens.

Expert Insight:

“Interoperability is crucial for the metaverse to reach its full potential. It ensures that users can take their assets and identities with them across platforms.” – John Doe, Tech Analyst.

3. Regulation and Governance

As the metaverse grows, governments and regulatory bodies are stepping in to establish rules and guidelines. This could impact everything from data privacy to virtual property rights.


Implications of Metaverse Ownership

The question of who owns the metaverse has far-reaching implications for businesses, creators, and users. Here’s what’s at stake:

1. For Businesses

The metaverse offers new opportunities for revenue and customer engagement. However, businesses must navigate complex ownership and intellectual property issues.

2. For Creators

Creators have the potential to monetize their skills and content in the metaverse. But they also face challenges, such as platform dependency and copyright disputes.

3. For Users

Users stand to benefit from immersive experiences and new forms of social interaction. However, they must also contend with issues like data privacy and digital addiction.


The Future of Metaverse Ownership

The future of metaverse ownership will likely be a hybrid model, combining elements of centralized and decentralized control. Here are some key trends to watch:

1. Rise of DAOs

Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) will play a bigger role in governing the metaverse, giving users more control over platforms and ecosystems.

2. Increased Regulation

As the metaverse matures, governments will introduce regulations to address issues like data privacy, intellectual property, and virtual property rights.

3. User Empowerment

Users will demand more ownership and control over their digital assets and identities. This could lead to the development of new tools and platforms that prioritize user rights.


Conclusion: A Shared Digital Frontier

The metaverse is a shared digital frontier, shaped by a diverse group of stakeholders. While tech giants, blockchain platforms, and investors are driving its development, the true owners of the metaverse are its users.

As the metaverse continues to evolve, it’s crucial to prioritize transparency, inclusivity, and user empowerment. By doing so, we can ensure that the metaverse remains a space for creativity, connection, and innovation.

So, who owns the metaverse? The answer is simple: we all do.

In the early 2000s, the world was on the brink of a communication revolution. The internet was becoming more accessible, and people were eager to connect across borders without the hefty price tags of traditional phone calls. Enter Skype, a groundbreaking platform that promised free voice and video calls over the internet. For over a decade, Skype was synonymous with online communication, but its journey from a trailblazing startup to a fading relic is a tale of innovation, missed opportunities, and fierce competition.

In this article, we’ll explore the rise and fall of Skype, examining how it changed the way we communicate, why it lost its edge, and what lessons we can learn from its story.

The Birth of Skype: A Revolutionary Idea

The Early Days of Internet Communication
Before Skype, long-distance communication was expensive and cumbersome. International calls were a luxury, and video calls were the stuff of science fiction. The internet was still in its infancy, but a few visionaries saw its potential to transform communication.

In 2003, a group of developers from Estonia and Sweden—Niklas Zennström, Janus Friis, and a team of talented engineers—created Skype. Their goal was simple yet ambitious: to make communication free and accessible to everyone.

How Skype Changed the Game

Skype’s peer-to-peer (P2P) technology was a game-changer. Unlike traditional phone systems, Skype used the internet to transmit voice data, bypassing costly infrastructure. Users could make free voice calls to other Skype users and affordable calls to landlines and mobile phones.

The introduction of video calls in 2005 took Skype to the next level. Suddenly, people could see their loved ones across the globe in real time. It was a revolutionary concept that resonated with millions.

The Rise of Skype: Dominating the Communication Landscape
Explosive Growth and Global Adoption

Skype’s user base grew exponentially. By 2010, it had over 600 million registered users, and its name became a verb—people would say, “Let’s Skype,” instead of “Let’s video call.”

Businesses also embraced Skype for its cost-effectiveness and convenience. Remote teams could collaborate seamlessly, and freelancers could connect with clients worldwide.

Key Features That Made Skype a Household Name


Free Voice and Video Calls: Skype’s core offering was its ability to connect people for free.

Affordable International Calls: Low rates for calling landlines and mobiles made it a favorite for expats and travelers.

User-Friendly Interface: Skype was easy to set up and use, even for non-tech-savvy users.

Cross-Platform Compatibility: It worked on desktops, laptops, and later, smartphones.

The eBay Acquisition and Microsoft’s Takeover


In 2005, eBay acquired Skype for $2.6 billion, hoping to integrate it into its marketplace. However, the synergy never materialized, and eBay sold Skype to an investor group in 2009.

In 2011, Microsoft stepped in, purchasing Skype for $8.5 billion—a staggering sum that signaled its potential. Microsoft integrated Skype into its ecosystem, including Windows and Office, further solidifying its position.

The Fall of Skype: A Series of Missteps

The Emergence of Competitors
While Skype was busy integrating with Microsoft, new players entered the market. Apps like WhatsApp, FaceTime, and Zoom offered simpler, more innovative solutions.

WhatsApp: Focused on mobile-first messaging and voice calls, WhatsApp quickly gained traction.

FaceTime: Apple’s seamless integration with iOS devices made it a favorite among iPhone users.

Zoom: With its superior video conferencing features, Zoom became the go-to platform for businesses and virtual events.

Skype’s Failure to Innovate
As competitors evolved, Skype struggled to keep up. Its interface became clunky, and new features felt like afterthoughts. Users complained about bugs, poor call quality, and a lack of innovation.

Microsoft’s decision to replace Skype with Microsoft Teams in 2020 was the final nail in the coffin. While Teams focused on enterprise communication, Skype was left to languish.

The Shift in User Preferences
The rise of mobile-first communication apps highlighted Skype’s shortcomings. Users wanted lightweight, intuitive apps that worked seamlessly across devices. Skype, with its desktop-centric design, failed to adapt.

Lessons from Skype’s Rise and Fall
The Importance of Continuous Innovation
Skype’s downfall underscores the need for constant innovation. In the tech world, resting on your laurels is a recipe for obsolescence.

Understanding User Needs
Skype lost touch with its users. While competitors focused on simplicity and convenience, Skype became bloated and complicated.

The Role of Competition
The rise of competitors like Zoom and WhatsApp shows how quickly the market can shift. Companies must stay agile and responsive to changing trends.

The Legacy of Skype
Despite its decline, Skype’s impact on communication is undeniable. It paved the way for modern platforms and showed the world the potential of internet-based communication.

Today, Skype still has a loyal user base, particularly among those who value its affordability and familiarity. However, its days as a dominant player are over.

A Cautionary Tale


The rise and fall of Skype is a story of innovation, success, and missed opportunities. It reminds us that even the most revolutionary ideas can falter without continuous evolution and a deep understanding of user needs.

As we look to the future of communication, Skype’s legacy serves as a cautionary tale and a source of inspiration. It’s a reminder that in the fast-paced world of technology, staying relevant requires more than just a great idea—it demands adaptability, foresight, and a relentless focus on the user.

FAQs About Skype

  1. What was Skype’s biggest innovation?
    Skype’s biggest innovation was its peer-to-peer technology, which allowed free voice and video calls over the internet.
  2. Why did Skype lose popularity?
    Skype lost popularity due to increased competition, a lack of innovation, and failure to adapt to mobile-first communication trends.
  3. Is Skype still available?
    Yes, Skype is still available, but its user base has significantly declined in favor of platforms like Zoom and WhatsApp.
  4. What replaced Skype?
    Microsoft Teams replaced Skype for enterprise communication, while apps like Zoom and WhatsApp became popular for personal use.
  5. What can businesses learn from Skype’s decline?
    Businesses can learn the importance of continuous innovation, understanding user needs, and staying ahead of competitors.

By reflecting on Skype’s journey, we can better navigate the ever-changing landscape of technology and communication. Whether you’re a tech enthusiast, a business leader, or simply someone who loves a good story, the rise and fall of Skype offers valuable insights and lessons for us all.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles