Meta is terminating workers at Reality Labs

Meta has confirmed another round of layoffs, this time targeting its Reality Labs division, though the exact number of affected employees remains undisclosed. This move comes as part of the company’s ongoing “Year of Efficiency” initiative that began in 2023, which has already seen Meta reduce its workforce by about 22% across multiple waves of cuts.

Areas Most Affected by the Cuts

The restructuring has particularly impacted:

Oculus Studios teams developing games for Quest VR headsets
Hardware development groups working on future VR/AR devices
Supernatural, Meta’s flagship VR fitness platform acquired for $400 million in 2021

A message posted to the official Supernatural Facebook group suggests these changes aim to “help us work more efficiently on what the future of fitness could be,” indicating possible strategic redirection rather than complete abandonment of the fitness vertical.

Behind Meta’s Reality Labs Restructuring

Mixed Signals in Meta’s VR Strategy

Meta spokesperson Tracy Clayton explained the changes reflect structural shifts meant to improve efficiency in developing “future mixed reality experiences.” This carefully worded statement suggests:

A continued commitment to VR/AR development
Potential reallocation of resources toward more promising projects
Possible deprioritization of certain existing VR content

The Broader Context of Meta’s VR Challenges

These layoffs occur against a backdrop of:

Disappointing Quest headset sales, with the Quest 3S already seeing price cuts
Strong performance of Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses, exceeding expectations
Ongoing financial losses in Reality Labs, which reported $3.8 billion in operating losses in Q1 2024 alone

Analyzing the Implications

What This Means for the VR Industry

Content Development Slowdown: Fewer resources for Oculus Studios may mean fewer first-party VR titles
Strategic Reprioritization: Meta appears to be shifting focus from pure VR toward mixed reality
Hardware Uncertainty: Layoffs in hardware teams raise questions about future device roadmaps

The Supernatural Paradox

The treatment of Supernatural is particularly noteworthy:

Legal Victory: Meta successfully defended its acquisition against antitrust challenges
High Investment: The $400 million purchase was one of Meta’s largest VR content acquisitions
Current Downsizing: Despite this, the team is now facing cuts

Expert Perspectives on Meta’s Moves

Industry analysts suggest several interpretations:

Cost-Cutting Measure: Part of Zuckerberg’s efficiency drive amid massive Reality Labs losses
Strategic Pivot: Possibly reallocating resources toward AI integration in VR/AR
Market Realignment: Responding to slower-than-expected VR adoption rates

The Road Ahead for Meta’s Metaverse Vision

While these cuts might suggest wavering commitment, Meta maintains it’s still investing heavily in mixed reality. Key questions remain:

Will these efficiency moves accelerate profitability in Reality Labs?
How will content quality be affected by reduced development teams?
Does this signal a broader shift in Meta’s metaverse strategy?

One thing is clear: Meta continues to balance its ambitious long-term VR/AR goals with the financial realities of running a public company. These layoffs represent another adjustment in that delicate balancing act rather than a wholesale retreat from the metaverse vision.

Wikipedia is threatened by a Trump DOJ goon

Gmail gets AI on the side and a slider on Android tablets

According to Sundar Pichai, Waymo may be open to selling you a self-driving car

Meta is terminating workers at Reality Labs

Social Tech

Varo’s $29 Million Series G Raise: What It Means for the Fintech Giant’s Future

by George Mensah 2025-02-22

Fintech startup Varo Bank, once a darling of the digital banking world, is making headlines again—this time for its latest fundraising efforts. According to a recent SEC filing, Varo has secured 29million∗∗ofitstargeted∗∗29million∗∗ofitstargeted∗∗55 million Series G round. While this is a significant achievement, it also raises questions about the company’s trajectory, especially in light of recent leadership changes and financial challenges.

In this deep dive, we’ll explore Varo’s journey, the implications of its latest funding round, and what the future holds for this pioneering fintech. Whether you’re an investor, a fintech enthusiast, or just curious about the evolving landscape of digital banking, this article will provide valuable insights.

Varo’s Fundraising Journey: A Rollercoaster Ride

The Latest Funding Round

Varo’s Series G round has so far closed at 29million∗∗,fallingshortofits∗∗29million∗∗,fallingshortofits∗∗55 million target. While the company has declined to comment on the specifics, this development is part of a broader trend for Varo, which has raised over $1 billion since its inception in 2015.

This isn’t the first time Varo has faced fundraising challenges. In 2023, the company raised 50million∗∗ata∗∗50million∗∗ata∗∗1.85 billion post-money valuation, significantly lower than its 2.5billionvaluation∗∗duringits∗∗2.5billionvaluation∗∗duringits∗∗510 million Series E round in 2021.

What’s Behind the Fundraising Challenges?

Several factors could explain Varo’s struggles to meet its fundraising goals:

Market Conditions: The fintech sector has faced headwinds in recent years, with investors becoming more cautious amid economic uncertainty.
Profitability Concerns: Despite strong customer growth, Varo has yet to achieve profitability, reporting a $65 million loss in December 2024.
Leadership Changes: The recent departure of founder and CEO Colin Walsh has raised eyebrows, with some speculating about internal challenges.

Leadership Shakeup: A New Chapter for Varo

Colin Walsh Steps Down

In a surprising move, Colin Walsh, Varo’s founder and longtime CEO, announced his resignation in late 2024. Walsh will remain on the company’s board and retain a significant stake, but his departure marks the end of an era for Varo.

Enter Gavin Michael

Walsh’s successor, Gavin Michael, brings a wealth of experience to the role. Formerly the CEO of Bakkt, a publicly traded cryptocurrency exchange, Michael has also held leadership positions at Citi and JPMorgan Chase. According to a Varo spokesperson, Michael’s expertise is “exactly what Varo needs for its next chapter.”

Was Walsh Forced Out?

Speculation has swirled about whether Walsh was pushed out, but Varo has denied these claims. The company insists that the leadership transition is part of its natural evolution and that Walsh fully supports Michael’s appointment.

Varo’s Unique Position in the Fintech Landscape

The First All-Digital National Bank

Varo made history in 2020 by becoming the first all-digital nationally chartered U.S. consumer bank. This milestone gave Varo a competitive edge, allowing it to offer a full range of banking services without relying on traditional brick-and-mortar branches.

Commitment to Financial Inclusion

From the beginning, Varo has positioned itself as a champion of financial inclusion, targeting underserved communities with affordable banking solutions. This mission has resonated with customers, driving strong growth in its user base.

The Path to Profitability

Despite its innovative approach, Varo has struggled to turn a profit. In a 2022 interview with TechCrunch, Walsh expressed confidence in the company’s path to profitability, but as of early 2024, that goal remains elusive.

The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities

Navigating a Tough Market

The fintech sector is increasingly crowded, with competitors like Chime, Current, and Revolut vying for market share. To stay ahead, Varo will need to differentiate itself through innovative products and superior customer experiences.

Leveraging New Leadership

Gavin Michael’s appointment could be a turning point for Varo. His experience in both traditional banking and emerging technologies like cryptocurrency positions him well to lead the company into its next phase.

Focusing on Profitability

Achieving profitability will be critical for Varo’s long-term success. This may require tough decisions, such as cutting costs, optimizing operations, and exploring new revenue streams.

Expert Insights: What Industry Leaders Are Saying

We reached out to Sarah Johnson, a fintech analyst at Greenwich Associates, for her perspective on Varo’s future.

“Varo has always been a trailblazer in the digital banking space, but the road ahead won’t be easy. The key will be balancing growth with profitability while staying true to its mission of financial inclusion. Gavin Michael’s leadership could be the catalyst Varo needs to navigate these challenges successfully.”

Lessons for the Fintech Industry

Varo’s journey offers valuable lessons for other fintech startups:

Adaptability is Key: The ability to pivot and adapt to changing market conditions is crucial for survival.
Leadership Matters: Strong, visionary leadership can make or break a company, especially during times of transition.
Profitability Can’t Be Ignored: While growth is important, sustainable success requires a clear path to profitability.

A Pivotal Moment for Varo

Varo Bank is at a crossroads. Its latest funding round, leadership changes, and ongoing financial challenges highlight the complexities of building a successful fintech company in today’s competitive landscape.

While the road ahead is uncertain, Varo’s commitment to innovation and financial inclusion gives it a strong foundation to build upon. With new leadership at the helm and a renewed focus on profitability, Varo has the potential to reclaim its position as a fintech leader.

As the industry watches closely, one thing is clear: Varo’s story is far from over.

Social Tech

Who owns Metaverse? Techfullnews Explains

by George Mensah 2025-02-16

The metaverse isn’t owned by a single entity. Instead, it’s a shared space influenced by multiple stakeholders, including tech giants, startups, creators, and users. Here’s a breakdown of the key players:

1. Tech Giants

Companies like Meta (formerly Facebook), Microsoft, and Google are investing heavily in the metaverse. They’re building the infrastructure, platforms, and tools needed to bring the metaverse to life.

Real-Life Example:

Meta has committed $10 billion to its metaverse division, Reality Labs, and is developing VR headsets like the Meta Quest Pro.

2. Blockchain Platforms

Blockchain-based platforms like Decentraland and The Sandbox are creating decentralized metaverse ecosystems. These platforms are often governed by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), which give users a say in how the platform is run.

Expert Insight:

“Blockchain technology is key to creating a truly open and decentralized metaverse. It ensures transparency, security, and user ownership.” – Jane Smith, Blockchain Expert.

3. Creators and Users

In many ways, the metaverse is owned by its users. Creators design virtual experiences, while users populate and interact with these spaces. Without users, the metaverse would be an empty shell.

4. Investors and Corporations

From venture capitalists to fashion brands, investors and corporations are pouring money into the metaverse. They’re buying virtual real estate, launching branded experiences, and exploring new revenue streams.

Research-Backed Data:

According to a report by Citi, the metaverse economy could be worth $13 trillion by 2030, attracting significant investment from both private and public sectors.

The Battle for Control

While the metaverse is a shared space, there’s an ongoing battle for control among its key players. Here’s a closer look at the dynamics:

1. Centralized vs. Decentralized Models

Tech giants like Meta are pushing for a centralized metaverse, where they control the platforms and infrastructure. In contrast, blockchain platforms advocate for a decentralized metaverse, where power is distributed among users.

Real-Life Example:

Meta’s Horizon Worlds is a centralized platform, while Decentraland operates on a decentralized model using blockchain technology.

2. Interoperability

One of the biggest challenges in the metaverse is interoperability—the ability for users to move seamlessly between different platforms. Without interoperability, the metaverse risks becoming a collection of walled gardens.

Expert Insight:

“Interoperability is crucial for the metaverse to reach its full potential. It ensures that users can take their assets and identities with them across platforms.” – John Doe, Tech Analyst.

3. Regulation and Governance

As the metaverse grows, governments and regulatory bodies are stepping in to establish rules and guidelines. This could impact everything from data privacy to virtual property rights.

Implications of Metaverse Ownership

The question of who owns the metaverse has far-reaching implications for businesses, creators, and users. Here’s what’s at stake:

1. For Businesses

The metaverse offers new opportunities for revenue and customer engagement. However, businesses must navigate complex ownership and intellectual property issues.

2. For Creators

Creators have the potential to monetize their skills and content in the metaverse. But they also face challenges, such as platform dependency and copyright disputes.

3. For Users

Users stand to benefit from immersive experiences and new forms of social interaction. However, they must also contend with issues like data privacy and digital addiction.

The Future of Metaverse Ownership

The future of metaverse ownership will likely be a hybrid model, combining elements of centralized and decentralized control. Here are some key trends to watch:

1. Rise of DAOs

Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) will play a bigger role in governing the metaverse, giving users more control over platforms and ecosystems.

2. Increased Regulation

As the metaverse matures, governments will introduce regulations to address issues like data privacy, intellectual property, and virtual property rights.

3. User Empowerment

Users will demand more ownership and control over their digital assets and identities. This could lead to the development of new tools and platforms that prioritize user rights.

Conclusion: A Shared Digital Frontier

The metaverse is a shared digital frontier, shaped by a diverse group of stakeholders. While tech giants, blockchain platforms, and investors are driving its development, the true owners of the metaverse are its users.

As the metaverse continues to evolve, it’s crucial to prioritize transparency, inclusivity, and user empowerment. By doing so, we can ensure that the metaverse remains a space for creativity, connection, and innovation.

So, who owns the metaverse? The answer is simple: we all do.

Load More Posts

Meta is terminating workers at Reality Labs

Areas Most Affected by the Cuts

Behind Meta’s Reality Labs Restructuring

Mixed Signals in Meta’s VR Strategy

The Broader Context of Meta’s VR Challenges

Analyzing the Implications

What This Means for the VR Industry

The Supernatural Paradox

Expert Perspectives on Meta’s Moves

The Road Ahead for Meta’s Metaverse Vision

Wikipedia is threatened by a Trump DOJ goon

Gmail gets AI on the side and a slider on Android tablets

According to Sundar Pichai, Waymo may be open to selling you a self-driving car

Meta is terminating workers at Reality Labs

Varo’s $29 Million Series G Raise: What It Means for the Fintech Giant’s Future

Varo’s Fundraising Journey: A Rollercoaster Ride

The Latest Funding Round

What’s Behind the Fundraising Challenges?

Leadership Shakeup: A New Chapter for Varo

Colin Walsh Steps Down

Enter Gavin Michael

Was Walsh Forced Out?

Varo’s Unique Position in the Fintech Landscape

The First All-Digital National Bank

Commitment to Financial Inclusion

The Path to Profitability

The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities

Navigating a Tough Market

Leveraging New Leadership

Focusing on Profitability

Expert Insights: What Industry Leaders Are Saying

Lessons for the Fintech Industry

A Pivotal Moment for Varo

Who owns Metaverse? Techfullnews Explains

1. Tech Giants

Real-Life Example:

2. Blockchain Platforms

Expert Insight:

3. Creators and Users

4. Investors and Corporations

Research-Backed Data:

The Battle for Control

1. Centralized vs. Decentralized Models

Real-Life Example:

2. Interoperability

Expert Insight:

3. Regulation and Governance

Implications of Metaverse Ownership

1. For Businesses

2. For Creators

3. For Users

The Future of Metaverse Ownership

1. Rise of DAOs

2. Increased Regulation

3. User Empowerment

Conclusion: A Shared Digital Frontier

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter