The Netflix Assassin Movie More Deserving Of A Prequel Than John Wick

Kate, the Netflix film starring Mary Elizabeth Winstead as a ruthless assassin, is a great candidate for a prequel series. It shares many of the same qualities as the John Wick films, but with enough unique elements to set it apart.

Like John Wick, Kate is a movie in which the protagonist sets out on one last bloody adventure, and it ends with enough finality that we know that Mary Elizabeth Winstead’s character won’t be picking up her sniper rifle ever again. This is why a prequel series is the only way to get more Kate.

Another important quality that Kate shares with the John Wick films is the potential for both by-the-numbers and ambitiously odd misadventures for the titular character. Kate’s skills as a hitwoman for hire would make it easy to create “villain of the week” television stories, but a prequel series also has room to tell more powerful stories, such as what it was like for Kate to be raised by an employer-turned-father figure who is destined to eventually betray her.

We could even learn more about Kate’s background and how she transitioned from someone who loved what she did to someone who couldn’t wait to bail. Where did her personal code against committing murders in front of children come from, and how much has it cost her to maintain it?

While later Wick sequels threw in everything but the kitchen sink in terms of action and story, part of Kate’s charm as a movie is that it is so wonderfully streamlined. This kept the story moving at a breakneck pace, but if we slowed things down with a prequel series, we could learn more about Kate’s background, her colleagues, her family, and the future she dreams of for herself (all of which the finished movie completely glosses over).

Of course, there are some challenges to creating a Kate prequel series. Mary Elizabeth Winstead is very busy, and it would be difficult to rival the John Wick prequel series, but the potential is definitely there.

Overall, a Kate prequel series would be an exciting opportunity to explore a well-developed character and her world in more depth. It would also be a chance to tell new and interesting stories that would appeal to fans of the action genre.tunesharemore_vertadd_photo_alternate

5 Cool Multifunction Pens: Gadgets You Never Knew You Needed

DOES APPLE’S MAGIC MOUSE WORK WITH WINDOWS?

Understanding the 4D CAR Concept: What It Means and How It Differs from 4WD

The Iconic Audi TT: A Legacy of Style and Performance

Entertainment

The Jason Statham Action Thriller Leaving Netflix For Good

by George Mensah 2023-10-01

The Expendables, the ensemble action film starring Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, and a who’s who of Hollywood’s biggest action stars, is leaving Netflix on October 4th. If you’re a fan of over-the-top action, cheesy one-liners, and explosions galore, then you need to watch this film before it’s gone.

The Expendables follows a team of mercenaries who are hired to overthrow a ruthless dictator in South America. Along the way, they must battle hordes of enemies, dodge exploding vehicles, and even take on a few of their own former allies.

The film is a love letter to ’80s action cinema, with plenty of nods to classic films like Rambo, Commando, and Predator. The cast is all in on the fun, and they clearly relish the opportunity to ham it up and deliver some truly memorable one-liners.

If you’re looking for a mindless action film that will leave you entertained from start to finish, then The Expendables is the perfect choice for you.

Here are a few reasons why you should watch The Expendables before it leaves Netflix:

It’s a celebration of ’80s action cinema. The film is full of references to classic ’80s action films, and the cast clearly has a blast playing up the tropes of the genre.
It’s a star-studded cast. In addition to Stallone and Statham, the film also features appearances from Bruce Willis, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jet Li, Mickey Rourke, and Terry Crews.
It’s over-the-top and ridiculous. The film doesn’t take itself too seriously, and it’s full of over-the-top action sequences and cheesy one-liners.
It’s a whole lot of fun. If you’re looking for a mindless action film that will leave you entertained from start to finish, then The Expendables is the perfect choice for you.

So what are you waiting for? Stream The Expendables on Netflix before it’s gone on October 4th!

Entertainment

Cyberpunk 2077’s First-Person Talking: A Secret Sauce

by George Mensah 2023-09-28

In a sea of RPGs released in recent years, two that stand out are Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty and Starfield. Both games are first-person RPGs, but they tackle the challenge of first-person talking in very different ways.

First-Person Talking

First-person games don’t have the luxury of cinematic camera angles to keep a conversation flowing. First-person RPGs need to be engaging enough to keep players interested without constantly cutting away to something new, all while players can only see (and often hear) one side of the conversation.

Cyberpunk 2077’s Approach

Cyberpunk 2077 takes a unique approach to first-person talking by allowing players to move around during conversations. This gives players a greater sense of agency and immersion, and it also makes conversations more dynamic and interesting.

In one example from the Phantom Liberty expansion, the player character has a long conversation with Idris Elba’s character while moving around a disused underground safehouse. Elba’s character paces around, reroutes power, and eventually sits down in an old lawn chair. Another character enters the room before either of them notices, and they awkwardly change subjects.

This kind of scene would be impossible in a traditional third-person RPG, but Cyberpunk 2077’s first-person perspective allows for a more immersive and dynamic experience. Players can choose to listen to the conversation while moving around, or they can focus on the characters and dialogue.

Starfield’s Approach

Starfield, on the other hand, takes a more traditional approach to first-person talking. Conversations are typically held in a static environment, with the player character and NPCs standing still and facing each other. The camera cuts to close-ups of characters’ faces as they speak, and the player character is often unable to move or look around.

This approach to first-person talking is less immersive than Cyberpunk 2077’s, but it is more efficient and easier to implement. It also allows for more cinematic storytelling, with Bethesda able to carefully control the camera and framing of each scene.

Both Cyberpunk 2077 and Starfield have their own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to first-person talking. Cyberpunk 2077’s approach is more immersive and dynamic, but it can also be distracting and less efficient. Starfield’s approach is less immersive, but it is more efficient and allows for more cinematic storytelling.

Ultimately, which approach is better is a matter of personal preference. Some players may prefer the immersion and dynamism of Cyberpunk 2077’s approach, while others may prefer the efficiency and cinematic quality of Starfield’s approach.

Additional Thoughts

In addition to the points made in the original article, I would like to add that Cyberpunk 2077’s approach to first-person talking also allows for more roleplaying opportunities. By allowing players to move around and interact with the environment during conversations, Cyberpunk 2077 gives players more control over how their characters behave and how they experience the story.

For example, a player might choose to pace around nervously during a tense conversation, or they might choose to sit down and relax during a friendly conversation. They might also choose to interact with objects in the environment, such as reading a book or petting a cat. This level of control over the roleplaying experience is one of the things that makes Cyberpunk 2077 such a unique and immersive game.

I also agree with the author’s point that Bethesda’s approach to first-person talking feels dated in comparison to Cyberpunk 2077’s approach. Bethesda’s zoomed-in camera transitions and static environments can be jarring and break immersion. I would be interested to see Bethesda experiment with a more dynamic approach to first-person talking in future games.

Load More Posts