Techfullnews

Owner of @x Twitter handle says no one reached out ahead of Twitter’s rebranding to ‘X’

x twitter

Twitter’s ambitious rebranding as “X” has hit a series of stumbling blocks, leading to a chaotic rollout that left many aspects of the site in disarray. While parts of the platform were referencing the new “X” brand, other sections still displayed prompts to “search Twitter” or use the familiar blue button to “Tweet.” As if that wasn’t enough, Reuters reported that Twitter failed to secure the intellectual property rights for the “X” brand.

The rebranding process faced further challenges when Twitter attempted to remove the iconic Twitter sign from its San Francisco headquarters without obtaining the necessary permit, resulting in police intervention to halt the work. To add to the confusion, Twitter also neglected to secure the @x Twitter handle, which is owned by Gene X Hwang, co-founder of the corporate photography and videography studio Orange Photography. While the @x account is currently set to private, it is referenced by the San Francisco-based @orangephoto account, attributing the founders as “Gene X Hwang & Jack Huynh,” with the latter being Jack Huynh.

Surprisingly, Twitter has yet to make any contact with Gene X Hwang regarding the @x account he operates. Hwang stated that he would be open to discussing the handle’s transfer if Twitter were to make a reasonable offer. However, he has not set a specific price in mind, although it is worth noting that coveted Instagram handles often sell for thousands of dollars.

The rushed nature of Twitter’s rebranding to “X” was evident as their website and app still contained references to the old name, even after Elon Musk’s announcement. Despite rebranding the main @Twitter handle as “X,” the underlying handle remained @twitter, leading to user confusion and criticism.

Apart from the handling of the rebrand itself, potential legal issues have arisen due to trademark conflicts. Microsoft holds an X trademark linked to Xbox since 2003, and Meta possesses a federal trademark for a blue-and-white letter “X” since 2019. Although Meta’s trademark logo differs from Twitter’s new “X” branding, the inclusion of online social networking services within their coverage raises concerns.

Trademark attorney Josh Gerben believes there is a high likelihood that Twitter will face legal challenges over the “X” rebranding. Gerben has counted nearly 900 active U.S. trademark registrations covering “X” in various industries, making the situation potentially complicated.

Aside from legal battles, Musk’s abrupt renaming of Twitter to “X” might have an adverse impact on the brand’s value. Analysts and agencies suggest that Musk’s move could have resulted in a significant decline of $4 billion to $20 billion in Twitter’s value, eroding the value that the brand has carefully built over 15-plus years.

As the dust settles on this eventful rebranding, Twitter will need to navigate potential legal issues while restoring confidence and value to its newly christened “X” identity. The path ahead remains uncertain, but Twitter’s ability to adapt and address these challenges will be crucial in shaping the success of the “X” brand in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

TikTok has categorically denied reports suggesting that its U.S. operations might be sold to billionaire Elon Musk.

This statement came in response to a Bloomberg report claiming that Chinese officials were considering selling TikTok’s U.S. business to Musk if their efforts to overturn an impending ban in the Supreme Court failed.

“We can’t be expected to comment on pure fiction,” a TikTok spokesperson told Variety.

TikTok’s Legal Battle Over U.S. Ban

The platform is currently awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on whether the ban violates the First Amendment. On January 10, justices heard arguments, with initial indications suggesting they might uphold the ban. The restriction is set to take effect on January 19.

The ban stems from legislation signed by President Joe Biden in April 2024, allowing the government to block foreign-owned apps viewed as potential threats to national security. TikTok faces a January 19 deadline to divest its U.S. operations or risk removal from app stores across the country. Instead of complying, TikTok has chosen to challenge the law in court.

Reports of Contingency Plans

According to Bloomberg, Chinese officials are reportedly exploring alternative options, including the possibility of selling TikTok’s U.S. branch. One scenario mentioned involves Musk’s company, X (formerly Twitter), taking over TikTok’s U.S. operations in collaboration with ByteDance, the app’s Chinese parent company.

This speculation has drawn attention due to Musk’s perceived alignment with President-elect Donald Trump. Trump recently requested the Supreme Court delay the ban, stating his intention to address the issue diplomatically after taking office.

Broader Context and Implications

The situation highlights the ongoing tension between the U.S. and China over issues such as data security and technological influence. While TikTok has consistently denied accusations of data misuse or ties to the Chinese government, the app has become a flashpoint in broader geopolitical conflicts.

A potential sale to Musk could significantly reshape TikTok’s U.S. operations, aligning them with the vision of an entrepreneur already transforming social media under his leadership. However, TikTok’s outright dismissal of such claims indicates its commitment to maintaining its independence and fighting the ban through legal channels.

As the Supreme Court decision looms, the future of TikTok in the U.S. hangs in the balance, with far-reaching implications for its American user base and the global tech ecosystem.

Elon Musk’s platform X is preparing to overhaul its block function, breaking away from traditional social media practices. Under the new policy, blocked users will still be able to view the posts of the person who blocked them, as long as the posts are public. However, they will be restricted from liking, reposting, or replying to these posts.

Musk has previously voiced his opinion on the issue, stating, “Blocking public posts makes no sense. It needs to be replaced by a stronger mute function.” Jack Dorsey, former Twitter co-founder and CEO, also supports this approach.

Elon Musk’s X are driving users away

While Musk and Dorsey argue that blocking public posts is redundant—since anyone can access them by simply logging out—others, like Tracy Chou, founder of the anti-harassment tool Block Party, believe the block function provides an essential layer of protection. Chou stated on X, “The friction matters! Making it easier for people to engage in harmful behavior isn’t a good thing.”

In response to the proposed changes, many X users are exploring alternatives, leading to a significant rise in activity on platforms like Bluesky. Over a two-day span, Bluesky saw 1.2 million new users and climbed to the second spot in the U.S. App Store’s Social Networking category, a dramatic jump from its previous ranking of 181.

Though user spikes don’t always translate into sustained engagement, this policy shift could have more lasting effects compared to X’s previous changes, such as its rebranding from Twitter. The adjustment focuses on the rights of blocked users, potentially putting those who rely on blocking for protection at greater risk.

X’s engineering team defended the update, stating, “Currently, block can be used to hide harmful or private information. With this change, users will gain more transparency and visibility into these behaviors.”

As X continues to evolve under Musk’s leadership, these changes may lead to a shift in user behavior, with more people seeking alternatives, potentially reshaping the social media landscape.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles